I was given permission to post an editorial piece written by Dr. Carl Ruby, Vice President of Student Life, that appeared in the on-campus newspaper, Cedars. As I wrote earlier in an update to my original post, a number of events coagulated last week to cause Dr. Ruby to (momentarily) pull the plug on a Shane Claiborne visit. There was a concerted effort to sully the school and leadership on the part by radical watchbloggers and reactionary conservatives, and Dr. Ruby felt the timing was not right for Shane to come. Afterwards he wrote these words of instruction to the student body. Great words of encouragement in the midst of a crazy situation.
(Also, I’m waiting on word to post an excellent letter he sent to faculty and staff. Posting that should clear up a lot of confusion…)
Some Random Reflections on Living as an Ordinary Radical
Last summer I saw a college student from another university reading a book with a strange cover by an author that I’d never heard of. The author was Shane Claiborne and the book was The Irresistible Revolution: Living as an Ordinary Radical. The student allowed me to thumb through the book and pretty soon, I was caught up in a story that disturbed and convicted me. Allow me to reflect on some random things that I’ve learned in my interactions with Shane Claiborne, and my recent decision to cancel his lecture on campus.
- For all of my adult life I’ve been a part of an evangelical group who pride ourselves on our high view of the scriptures. We defend its inspiration, its authority, and its inerrancy as we should. But sometimes we can get so distracted talking about how much we value Scripture that we forget to obey it. Shane’s book forced me to reflect on the relationship between my faith and my works (See James 2:14-19)…particularly as it relates to following Christ’s example of ministry to the poor and destitute. I must admit I’m a better believer in Jesus than I am a follower.
- Choosing up sides is a human tendency and a reflection of our sinful nature. Paul chided the believers in Corinth for choosing sides around certain Christian leaders (“I follow Paul” or” I follow Apollos”). He begged them to take their eyes off of Christian celebrities and to unite around the person of Jesus Christ (I Cor 1:10-13). Lets’ not be defined by our allegiance to Shane Claiborne, Dallas Willard, John Piper, D.A. Carson, or anyone else. Let’s be Christians who are known first and foremost for being people of Jesus.
- I need to think more carefully about my political values. I fear that I have allowed my party affiliation to shape how I interpret some of the words of Christ more than I have allowed the words of Christ to shape my political opinions. I thank people like Shane for reminding me of this.
- Doctrinal statements aren’t enough when it comes to deciding whom we can partner with in ministry. They are important, but they are not enough. James noted that demons can have correct doctrine (James 2:19). Some of the blogs that are attacking us with information that they know to be false have doctrinal statements almost identical to ours. Doctrine is important but we must also rely on the presence or lack of Christian virtues like humility, compassion, kindness, joy, truthfulness, and gentleness in deciding whom we can partner with in ministry (Galatians 5:22-26; 2 Cor. 6:6; Ephesians 4:2; Col. 3:12-15).
- Shane thinks that many young people are turning away from Christianity, not because we have made it too hard but because we have made it too easy; not because discipleship demands too much but because we’ve let it demand too little. His advice; “Choose Jesus and do something daring with your life.” Good advice!
- My last reflection is this: Cedarville students are phenomenal. Your grace, kindness and gentleness remind me of Jesus and make me want to partner with you for the rest of my life.













While Dr. Ruby is certainly a wonderful Christian, I think this was still a decision that leads t0 regression. As Dr. Ruby points out, Claiborne’s message is certainly not a threat to the truth of Jesus Christ. Instead, his message is a threat to a branch of religious culture that equates the gospel with individualism and consumerism. This was a very unfortunate decision. Claiborne can offer a genuine and necessary rebuke to those of us who lazily and lavishly spend the gospel away.
Knowing Dr. Ruby personally- he is a very nice man. However, his thinking is one of the shallowest I have encountered. His thinking and positions are like a ship tossed in the ocean- wavering back and forth. Dr. Ruby does not know what he believes or stands for and waits for the latest faith guru to influence him. This is the problem- it is not about what Jesus said. Rather, it is that Dr. Ruby is never really sure what Jesus said and is always looking for the latest fashionable interpretation.
I, too, know Dr. Ruby very personally, and would like to very strongly disagree. For the past two decades in which I have interacted with him, he has stood firmly by his beliefs and convictions and followed Jesus wholeheartedly. What you interpret as "shallow," or "like a ship tossed in the ocean," is not that at all. Rather, he recognizes his humanity, and thus his non-omnipotence. Instead of "looking for the latest fashionable interpretation" of Jesus, he is constantly trying to better understand Jesus. Whether that be from Shane Claiborne or Augustine is not for you or I to judge. Having a few disagreements with your brother in Christ (referring to Claiborne) ought not deafen your ears to everything he has to say. And as for not knowing what Jesus said? That is ridiculous. I personally have never seen a man more devoted to studying and following the Jesus he loves than Carl Ruby. I have confided in Dr. Ruby numerous times throughout my life and his first response is always prayer and the word of God. You clearly didn't know him well enough.
As someone who has known and spoken to both Dr. Ruby and Shane Claiborne, I can say that questioning either man's commitment to Christ is ridiculous. They both strive to serve Jesus Christ with the opportunities and skills they've been given. I find it even more ridiculous that people automatically consider Shane some "leftist" because his exterior is a bit dirty and he may say radical things (did Jesus not do the same?). Shane has never identified himself with any political party, ideology, or system other than Jesus Christ himself (I'd argue that he identifies with Christ more wholly than the hypocritical Christians who certainly make their political affiliations well-known). More importantly, instead of blogging and commenting, Shane is ACTIVE in being the hands and feet of Christ in this world…serving with the poor, caring for the marginalized, and actively working with people to reveal the Kingdom that Christ in this world. Perhaps the commentators (yes, myself included) should take note.
BINGO! He’s either delusional or a megalomaniac. Or senile. Regardless, he thinks he has all the answers for the rest of us. He’ll force his political views on others and claim that Jesus’ teachings gives him the right to do so. He’s the epitome of the hypocritical “Christian”. Christians don’t FORCE their beliefs on others. EVER.