
The “Missional Monday” Series
1) Introduction
2) Jesus Intensionally Forms The Church
3) Jesus Calls Us Out From A Previous ID
4) Jesus Sends Us Into Mission
5) Jesus Is With Us In Mission
A month ago I wrote about how I was in an intense week long church planting class for my M. Div concentration in church planting. It was a wonderful week where we drunk long and hard on the “vision bottle” and sat at the Bride of Jesus, taking in her fullness, grandur and beauty. It was truly a wonderful week!
What was especially wonderful were the conversations we had on the Church. In one particular discussion, Dr. Fagerstrom (the President of GRTS) asked the question, “what are the marks of a healthy church?” We all agreed that discipleship, evangelism, worship, and teaching are signs of a healthy church. But some of us thought something was missin, so I offered this: “isn’t a core component of a healthy church being missional? Shouldn’t a sign of a healthy church be a local body that takes it’s calling as a called-out and sent people seriously?”
While some people agreed, most people said that missional activity (the notion that we are a sent people on mission by God into our indigenous communities) was an outgrowth of a healthy church, rather than a core identity. Meaning: when a church gets it’s shit together inside the walls, then it will naturally serve the world around it well.
I disagree.
I am firmly convinced that mission is central to the identity of Jesus’ community of followers. Not mission programs or trips or -aries (though those are needed too!) Rather, what makes a church the Church is the realization that they are sent on mission as Jesus was sent on mission.
Unfortunately, the Church (more so the USAmerican kind) has become a place where certain things happen (teaching, singing, eating) rather than being a body and community of called out and set apart people sent on mission.
According to Jesus, the Church is a group of “called out ones” and particularly for a specific purpose (which is the very concept inherent in the greek word ekklesia used by Jesus in Matthew 16). We are called out, set apart, and sent, not as a vendor of religious goods, but as a people for God’s liberation and restoration movement.
The church is a gathered people, brought together by a common calling and vocation to be a sent people. And Luke 5 does a beautiful job at painting this very thing.
In my last post on this topic someone asked what I mean by the term missional. If, as I contend, missional activity is the core marker of a healthy church, rather than a byproduct, then I need to layout what I mean and why I think Jesus had this in mind for His called-out ones from the beginning. So for the next several mondays, I will layout the missional commission Jesus has given his followers. I’m calling it “Missional Monday” and I trust Luke 5 will paint the Church as a called-out people for the purpose of sending them on mission.













“Missional Monday”! What a catchy title for a weekly series on missional things.
(just for the record, I posted first ;))
I saw a “missional monday” post on The Daily Scribe before mine and thought someone had given me some linkage…then I saw you beat me to it 🙂
great minds think alike, right grace?
-jeremy
Good points. I think I agree with you that mission is a central component of a healthy church. Otherwise, we can fall victim to “naval gazing”.
Jeremy,
I meant to interact with the content of your post and forgot.
I agree with you that missional is an identity issue for the church. I think the difference you are seeing here is in an organizational versus organic paradigm of church. With the organizational mentality mission is viewed through a program lens and is therefore an outgrowth, something that happens.
In the organic paradigm, as you said, missional is a part of our core identity, the nature of who we are as a people.
I’m looking forward to following your series.
YES Pistol…and I’m afraid their is much navel gazing going on!
thanks for your thoughts grace…and I REALLY like your insight about organization vs organic modes of church. In an org framework mission is something we DO; in an organic framework mission is something we ARE, or are sent on, it’s apart of our very identity…
good stuff and I look forward to more of your thoughts 😉
-jeremy
Jeremy, great outline for the series. I agree with you wholeheartedly about the marks of a healthy church. Being “sent” is the very nature/essence of the church. I have spent alot of time the past few months reading and thinking about your number 3 & 4, but not so much with your other points. I look forward to keeping up with your series.
Thanks Brad! I wish people would see it like us 😉